things to do with slide film, while you still can

I wish I knew now what kind of camera my dad actually had. I know it came in a brown case, and had a chrome body. It must of been an SLR of some kind, and dates back to the mid 1960′s. whatever it was, it’s long gone now….but I do have a few of the photos taken with it. Like most amateur photographers of the pre-digital age, the camera only seemed to come out on special occasions; weddings, trips to the beach, parties, family gatherings.

Mum and Dad circa 1967

The other thing I remember is the little viewer that my dad had. It was a small box with a slot in the top for the mounted slides. As you pushed them in the pressure would trigger a light, and suddenly the picture would spring to life in glorious Kodacolor.

Beautiful, isn’t it? And very sad that it’s a dying format. Really, there is no getting away from it, no sugar coating it, slide film will be totally gone within the next few years. Kodachrome was much beloved, but that didn’t save it. Now Kodak has killed the entire line – not one colour reversal remains. Fuji are still producing a few, but they are getting ridiculously expensive. Still, every once in a while they take one out behind the barn and shoot it unceramoniously in the back of the head.

The reason I miss slide film, though, is not for it’s luminosity, it’s colour reproduction or it’s fine, smooth grain. To be honest, I think I’ve only shot about a dozen rolls of slide film for that in my life. I just find it too hard to meter correctly, too sensitive, and I don’t think it really suits my style. I have a couple of pictures I value, but not many more.

4505879665_546746bda1_o

4491552851_5eb61485a5_o

Both with a glass lens Holga, incidentally.

No, what I’ll miss about slide film is the cross-processing. Sacrilege, isn’t it? That gorgeous film dragged through the wrong chemicals to produce some kind of proto-instagram crap. Well, maybe. But don’t worry, you won’t be seeing it for much longer. In fact, I may well just have xpro’d my last roll of film.

The classic xpro look, the lomokev style, came from Agfa Precisa CT. Agfa are gone, with all their emulsions – what you see now branded as Agfa are just rebadged Fuji. And Fuji does not cross-process well at all.

2782322796_a00ec2a54e_b

2775479404_8ba8fdf675_b

I mean it’s interesting in it’s own way, but 36 neon pink or sickly green frames gets tired pretty fast. Crossprocessed Precisa, however, was still brash, but in a much more balanced and appealing way. Colours shifted rather than transformed completely. Grain was enhanced but not overpowering. Sometimes it was even subtle.

4727078132_c6c1b64f98_b

For a while, the Kodak films filled the gap. A little more punchy, a little more erratic, but still fun.

3065741482_380a60da46_b

Now that’s gone too. So, down to my last roll, what’s the best thing to do? Intercontinental double exposure, cross processed, through a Lomo LCA? Of course!

000040

000024

000033

000014

000020

000005

I think I’ve got closure, and now I can move on.

pixelstats trackingpixel

5 thoughts on “things to do with slide film, while you still can

  1. I’ve got a fridge full of Provia 100 and 400 at the moment.

    The 400 pushes quite well and gives an interesting result but at ¥1260 a roll nowadays it’s starting to get painful.

    What about the Lomography slide film?

  2. I think it might be that Rollei 200. If it’s a chrome based film, it might be alright…. I’d have to search out a few samples.

  3. I still have one of those slide viewers your dad had. My dad shot 127 b&w film mostly, in a very basic bakelite camera called a Kodak Bullet. I no longer have that camera but am thinking of getting one, just for old time’s sake. Dad used to throw out his negatives – a really annoying habit. He thought they were useless.

  4. Thinking about it, it may not have been an SLR. It definitely took 35mm film though, as I have the mounted slides to prove it. It might have been a Kodak of some kind, but sadly he’s no longer around to ask….

Leave a Reply